Cases and investigations against Flávio Bolsonaro that are ongoing or have a standing sanction in the latest information located.
Explore the archiveOngoing cases and standing judgments / sanctions in the latest information located.
A more intense red indicates higher editorial severity. Color does not establish guilt. Closed or dismissed cases are not displayed.
This is a survey of public records found online through 27 October 2026. It is neither an official court certificate nor a complete list of all existing cases.
English translation of the Portuguese edition. Source labels are translated; linked documents remain in their original language. Brazilian legal terms are described in context.
Only proceedings against Flávio Bolsonaro that are ongoing or have a judgment or sanction without documented closure. Closed, archived, annulled, time-barred, acquitted or dismissed cases and requests without a confirmed opening are not displayed. Status reflects the latest source located; records are not a count of crimes.
Court, prosecution service and Senate sources take priority. Identified news reports supplement the record. Allegations are attributed to those who made them; decisions and defense responses appear in the same record.
Sealed files, unindexed cases and unpublished decisions may be absent. “Latest record” means the most recent source located for that entry. Unconfirmed outcomes are explicitly identified. Published editions include only verified changes.
An AI agent is scheduled to review and update the website weekly. It researches new developments, updates summaries and the status of proceedings, and removes closed cases from view. Severity classifications and counts are reviewed in light of documented information, keeping the Portuguese and English versions equivalent.
A person whose possible involvement is being examined. This status alone does not establish guilt.
Prosecutors may submit a criminal complaint (denúncia). In Brazilian criminal proceedings, a person becomes a defendant (réu) when the court accepts that complaint.
The grounds matter. Rejection of a criminal complaint and invalidation of evidence are not equivalent to a judgment on the merits of the allegation.
A civil damages award or an electoral fine should not be described as a criminal conviction. Each type of proceeding has its own purpose.